Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.300/2025

Case between Muhammed Kunju vs Pathumma et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Kunju filed a suit against Pathumma and others. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The dismissal occurred as the plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent. Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Kunju (57 years) Kanaliparambil @ Kaneliparambil House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village

Defendants

Pathumma (45 years) Kanaliparambil @ Kaneliparambil House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village Haseena (25 years) Kudulingal House, Mudickal P.O, Pallipram Kara, Marambilly Village Phaseela (23 years) Malayilan House, Nooleli Kara, Asamannoor Village Ansi (21 years) Keerikkadan House, Vengola Kara, Arackappady Village Pathumma (65 years) Anikkattil House, Thottumukham Kara, Aluva East Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent. Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases