Case Summary
The complainant, Muhammed Ansar, filed a withdrawal petition. The accused, Aneesh R, was acquitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant's withdrawal petition was allowed, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ansar
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesh R.
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. J. Niyas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Pradeep Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition.
Evidence:
Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023