Case Summary
Petitioners filed Rent Control Petition seeking permission to act on behalf of mentally retarded person Ayisumma under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act against the respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Rent Control Petition maintainable
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The duty casted upon the court is to protect and safeguard the interest of the persons affected with mental infirmity, and the petitioners, being the brothers of the mentally retarded person, are proper persons to safeguard the interest of the mentally retarded person.
The duty casted upon the court is to protect and safeguard the interest of the persons affected with mental infirmity, and the petitioners, being the brothers of the mentally retarded person, are proper persons to safeguard the interest of the mentally retarded person.
Judgment Evidence:
So I am not inclined to look into the other aspects. Hence the petition is maintainable.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Muhammed Abdurahiman (74 years)
Tirur Amsom, Kot Desom, Tirur Taluk
Abdurahiman (42 years)
Thrikkandiyoor Amsom, Annara Desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Moideen Master's children (Age not specified years)
Niramaruthoor Amsom, Pathampad Desom, Tirur Taluk
Kallingal Salma (40 years)
Post Kuttippala, Kazhungilappadi, Tirur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Rent Control Petition maintainability
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Maintainability of RCP challenged for filing on behalf of mentally retarded person
Evidence:
The court declared that the Rent Control Petition filed by the petitioners to act on behalf of a mentally retarded person is maintainable.