Case Summary
Muhammad and Abdulla are the petitioners, while Jabir is the respondent. The case pertains to a rent control petition that has been settled and dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed after the matter was settled.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MUHAMMAD
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- ABDULLA
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- JABIR
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ali. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Ragesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MUHAMMAD vs JABIR regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between MUHAMMAD vs JABIR regarding Rent Control Petition