Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2494 OF 2016

Case between Muhammad Shahir et al vs M.T. Muhammad et al regarding eviction from property

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.
Order Date
2017-06-20
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Tue, 06/20/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners, defendants in the suit, sought to set aside an exparte decree for eviction. Respondents disputed the petition, claiming fabricated ailments and intentional absence by the petitioners in previous trial appearances.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioners pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- to the respondents by a specified date, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Opportunity to contest the matter by setting aside the exparte decree
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioners pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- to the respondents by a specified date, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Court found that the petitioners had presented insufficient reasons for their absence and delay, and granted them an opportunity to contest the eviction suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is no sufficient reason for non absence and the delay caused. Since it is always desirable to have a disposal on the merits of the case, I hold a view that the petitioners are entitled to get a opportunity to contest the matter. Therefore I hold a view that the petitioner can be allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioner to the respondent for the inconvenience caused to them. The point is found accordingly.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition was allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioners to the respondents on or before 27.07.2017.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Meleveettil Abdul Basheer's Children
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madambathu Thadathil Koya Haji's Son
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical prescription dated 6.9.2016, Casuality OP ticket dated 05.09.2016
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Opportunity to contest the matter
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Setting aside the exparte decree to contest eviction suit
Evidence:
The petition was allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioners to the respondents on or before 27.07.2017.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Medical prescription
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence of ailment for non-appearance
Reference:
Document Type: Casuality OP ticket
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence of hospital visit
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non appearance in court proceedings
Case Code
Case between Muhammad Shahir et al vs M.T. Muhammad et al regarding eviction from property
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammad Shahir et al vs M.T. Muhammad et al regarding eviction from property

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 06/20/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/20/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 07/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Moideenkutty @ Kunhava Haji vs Puthenpeediyan Ali regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Pookunhiyakath Beeran Haji vs C.T. Shuhad regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Ponnani Ma oonathool Islam Association et al vs K.K. Usman regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won