Case Summary
Ayisha, the plaintiff, aged 47 and wife of Mammu filed a suit against Yahu seeking eviction. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Eviction suit dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for eviction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for eviction It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Wife of Mammu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yahu
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o. Seethi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.P.A. Sathar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.M. Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
To evict defendant from the property
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction