Case Summary
Muhammad Anwar is the petitioner seeking eviction of K.P. Surendran from a shop room. The respondent has agreed to vacate the premises as per an undertaking given to the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded the respondent's undertaking to vacate the premises within six months. The execution petition is closed for now.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent agreed to vacate the shop as per the undertaking.
The respondent agreed to vacate the shop as per the undertaking.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent agreed to vacate the shop as per the undertaking.
The respondent agreed to vacate the shop as per the undertaking.
Supporting Evidence
JD is also depositing the arrears before the Court. As per undertaking JD is ready to vacate the shop room within 6 months.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the undertaking is recorded. EP is closed for the time being.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammad Anwar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.P.Surendran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- SIJU. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.R BIJU
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
JD is ready to vacate the shop room within 6 months.
Evidence:
As per undertaking JD is ready to vacate the shop room within 6 months.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Proceedings
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammad Anwar vs K.P.Surendran regarding eviction proceedings.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammad Anwar vs K.P.Surendran regarding eviction proceedings.