Case Summary
The case involves a petition by AP Sai Narayan against the respondents regarding eviction proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the eviction petition as not pressed by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- AP Sai Narayan
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narangali Sathyan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheela Sathyan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haritha Sathyan
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hanima Sathyan
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anil Viswanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.M.Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for Decree holder submits that he had received key of plaint schedule property. Hence EP is not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Proceedings
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between AP Sai Narayan vs Narangali Sathyan et al regarding eviction proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between AP Sai Narayan vs Narangali Sathyan et al regarding eviction proceedings