Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 769/2020

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Siraj.P.A. regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 08/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s.Canara Bank has filed a suit against Siraj.P.A. to recover an amount due under an overdraft facility. The defendant's repayments were irregular, prompting the bank to seek recovery of dues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realize the owed amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.33,733.98 and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realize the owed amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and established the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and established the claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A6 established the case as pleaded by plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.33,733.98 from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s.Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siraj.P.A.
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 21.01.2017, Original general agreement dated 21.01.2017, Original pay in slip dated 28.12.2017, Statement of account of defendant's overdraft credit facility.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.33,733.98 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.33,733.98...
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit.
Evidence:
2. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12 % per annum for Rs.33,733.98...
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum from date of decree.
Evidence:
3. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.33,733.98...
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant.
Evidence:
4. The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant in favor of erstwhile Syndicate Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original general agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favor of Syndicate Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original pay in slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Payment made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of account of defendant's overdraft credit facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the loan account along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of account of defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Printout of notification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notification certifying the amalgamation of Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Siraj.P.A. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Siraj.P.A. regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/21/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won