Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 194/2019

Case between M/s UCO Bank vs Sreejith Lal et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-09
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s UCO Bank filed a suit against Sreejith Lal and others for the recovery of an education loan amounting to ₹4,69,610/-. The defendants claimed they had not availed the loan and raised issues including the maintainability of the suit and the challenge of limitation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the loan was taken by the defendants but dismissed the suit citing it was barred by limitation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was barred by limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s UCO Bank (Age not specified years) 10, BTM Sarani Kolkota

Defendants

Sreejith Lal (30 years) Muraka Vilasam, Puthakil, NR city P.O, Idukki- 685 566 Vijayakumar (59 years) Muraka Vilasam, Puthakil, NR city P.O, Idukki- 685 566 Rajamma Vijayakumar (30 years) Muraka Vilasam, Puthakil, NR city P.O, Idukki- 685 566

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of the loan amount due.
Evidence:
The suit is hopelessly barred by limitation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the education loan agreement executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the sanction of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Computer print of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed statement of the loan account showing the balance and transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Interest Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the interest charged on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the notice issued to the defendants regarding the loan recall.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases