Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 106/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs Amalesh E.R et al regarding money recovery.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank filed a suit against Amalesh E.R and others for recovery of a personal loan amounting to Rs. 2,47,874 due to default in repayment. The court found that the defendants had availed the loan under the UCO Educational Loan Scheme but failed to repay as agreed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 2,47,874 with interest. The defendants were found liable for the debt under the loan agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directing the defendants to pay Rs. 2,47,874 with 9% interest per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 2,47,874 with interest. The defendants were found liable for the debt under the loan agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 2,47,874/-(Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy Four Only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amalesh E.R
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rameshan E.S
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praseela P.R
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
The letter of sanction containing the terms and conditions, The Agreement for Education loan, The Guarantee Agreement executed by the defendants, The revival letter executed by the defendants, The statement of account issued by the plaintiff bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.G.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sarath Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum due from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 2,47,874/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy Four Only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter of sanction containing the terms and conditions
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the terms and conditions of the educational loan sanctioned to Defendant No.1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the obligations of the defendants regarding the repayment of the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement executed by the defendants
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a guarantee for the loan taken by Defendant No.1 from the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Revival letter executed by the defendants
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter acknowledges the revival of the loan by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Revival letter executed by the defendants
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the defendants' acknowledgment of their liability regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding balance on the defendants' loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Calculation statement of the interest in term loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement details the interest calculations related to the defendants' term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs Amalesh E.R et al regarding money recovery.
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs Amalesh E.R et al regarding money recovery.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Gokul Kalesh et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Ajith A.K et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No. 10 Nila et al regarding realization of money.
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs M/s Janani Foods et al regarding loan recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Shymon P regarding money recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won