Case Summary
This case involves M/s. UCO Bank as the plaintiff and K. Nandakumar and Nisha Nandakumar as defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to take necessary steps.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation, as no steps were taken to issue summons to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. UCO Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Nandakumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nisha Nandakumar
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pearson S. Fernandez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Zeena S. Fernandez
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is absent. No representation. No steps are seen taken for issuing summons to D1,D2. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs K. Nandakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs K. Nandakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit for default