Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 36/2021

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance, Co.(P) Ltd vs Rijo Jacob regarding cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-12-27
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months 13 days
Case Code No.
36
Case Closed
Sat, 12/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance, Co.(P) Ltd filed a complaint against Rijo Jacob for dishonouring a cheque issued towards discharge of a legally enforceable liability. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court convicted Rijo Jacob for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and ordered him to pay compensation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused shall pay 40,000/- as compensation with interest at 9% per annum from the date of cheque till realisation.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court convicted Rijo Jacob for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and ordered him to pay compensation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt, and statutory requirements under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were complied with.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the complainant proved all the ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The accused is convicted under section 55(2) Cr.P C for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance, Co.(P) Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rijo Jacob
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
The certified copy of the Power of attorney, the true extract of the resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the complainant company, the promissory note dated 28.12.2018, the cheque dated 12.04.2021, the dishonour memo dated 06.07.2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K S Ashif
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is directed to pay 40,000/- as compensation with interest.
Evidence:
The accused shall pay 40,000/- as compensation with interest at 9% per annum from the date of cheque till realisation.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for two months.
Evidence:
In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for two months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The certified copy of the Power of attorney establishes the authority of the complainant to represent the case.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The true extract of the resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the complainant company supports the legitimacy of the complaint.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note dated 28.12.2018 substantiates the financial transaction between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Monthly statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The monthly statement maintained by the surety and the complainant company details the financial interactions relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque dated 12.04.2021 for Rs. 40,000 is central to the claim of dishonour and the statutory requirements under Section 138.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The dishonour memo dated 06.07.2021 confirms that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of the lawyer's notice sent to the accused demonstrates compliance with statutory notice requirements.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt provides evidence of the delivery of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The A/D card serves as further proof of the receipt of the statutory notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P9

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
2 months

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/13/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Malankara Plantation Limited vs Suresh S regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Movish M.R regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate – IV Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs.Thasni Mayin regarding offence under section 138 of NI Act.
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won