Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 579/2023

Case between M/s Punjab & Sind Bank vs Rajalakshmi S R regarding abatement of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Punjab & Sind Bank filed a suit against Rajalakshmi S R, the sole defendant. As the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken against the deceased defendant's legal heirs, the suit was abated.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was abated due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to take steps against the legal heirs of the deceased defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was abated due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to take steps against the legal heirs of the deceased defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not take necessary steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not take necessary steps.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Plaintiff absent continuously. No steps seen taken against Legal heirs of defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is abated. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Punjab & Sind Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajalakshmi S R
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saji Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alfi Anwar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepu Anil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Abated
Description:
The suit is abated due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to take steps against the legal heirs of the deceased defendant.
Evidence:
Hence suit is abated. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Punjab & Sind Bank vs Rajalakshmi S R regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Punjab & Sind Bank vs Rajalakshmi S R regarding abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won