Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 371/2020

Case between M/s. Muthoot Motors (Cochin) JLR Division et al vs Usman Sheikh C.A regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-6 years 4 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Muthoot Motors, a service center for Jaguar and Range Rover in Kerala, filed a suit against Usman Sheikh for recovery of payment related to vehicle servicing. The defendant failed to pay despite repeated reminders, leading to the suit for recovery of dues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the recovery of the claimed amount along with specified interest. The defendant was found in default for non-appearance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,00,833/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the recovery of the claimed amount along with specified interest. The defendant was found in default for non-appearance.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged testimony and evidence, proving their claim for the due amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged testimony and evidence, proving their claim for the due amount.
Supporting Evidence
Upon perusing the unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A7 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,00,833/- from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Muthoot Motors (Cochin) JLR Division
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Gimson Jose
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Charly Mathew
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usman Sheikh C.A
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorization letter dated 21.11.2024, Tax invoices dated 02.11.2019, letters issued to the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Prakash Bavakkat
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,00,833/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,00,833/- (Rupees two lakhs eight hundred and thirty three only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at different rates until realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.2,00,833/- (Rupees two lakhs eight hundred and thirty three only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Subsequent interest at a lower rate until realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,00,833/-(Rupees two lakhs eight hundred and thirty three only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the authorization for the representative of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice indicates the charges for the service provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice confirms additional charges for further service to the defendant's vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a reminder for payment to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter is a response from the defendant regarding the service issues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter is an additional communication from the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was sent to the defendant regarding the pending payment.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s. Muthoot Motors (Cochin) JLR Division et al vs Usman Sheikh C.A regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Muthoot Motors (Cochin) JLR Division et al vs Usman Sheikh C.A regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/30/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won