Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.385/2018

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishamol E M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-18
Duration
7 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on the payments. The defendants, including Nishamol E M and others, dispute the claim citing various reasons including hardships faced due to natural calamities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the suit for recovery of the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs. The defendants were ordered to pay a total amount due including interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay the amount of Rs. 1,58,900/- along with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the suit for recovery of the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs. The defendants were ordered to pay a total amount due including interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the execution of the loan agreement and the defendants' default in payments.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the execution of the loan agreement and the defendants' default in payments.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has satisfactorily shown that after deducting instalments paid, an amount of 1,56,000/- remains due. This issue is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 1,58,900/- along with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Representation
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nishamol E M
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beenamol K
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abduljaleel E M
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bilal A M
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory note, Loan Agreement No.TL 213/2017, Office copy of the Lawyer notice, Resolution extract, Copy of Non-banking Certificate of Registration.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T V Eldho
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blesson Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju D Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 1,58,900/- along with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff has succeeded in proving its claim, it is entitled to costs as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was essential to establish the loan agreement and the defendants' obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan including the amount and interest rate.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that statutory notices were issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Resolution Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were used to show that the Manager was authorized to represent the company.
Reference:
Ext.A5, A6
Document Type: Copy of Non-banking Certificate of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was relevant to establish the plaintiff's legal standing as a non-banking financial institution.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of personal ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides details of the payments made and outstanding amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishamol E M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishamol E M et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Tue, 10/23/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P Paul et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Arafa Marketing regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Babiyos Marketing regarding recovery of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishad M.M., Najeeba Nishad, Ibrahamkutty M.M. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won