Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 433/2019

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Martin.P.A., Antony. P.V., Thankamma regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank has filed a suit against three defendants for the non-repayment of a loan. The court found that the first and third defendants owe a total amount of ₹33,152 to the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit, directing the first and third defendants to pay the plaintiff ₹33,152 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of amount with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit, directing the first and third defendants to pay the plaintiff ₹33,152 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's manager proved the defendants' liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's manager proved the defendants' liability.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved with respect to the first and third defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed as follows: The first and third defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 33,152/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Martin.P.A.
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony. P.V.
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamma
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Pronote, Take delivery letter to DPN, Agreement for general consumption loan, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Statement of account, Returned Postal Envelope, Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The first and third defendants are directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹33,152 with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the first and third defendants owe a total amount of 33,152/- to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the first and third defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the first and third defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the delivery of the document concerning the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for General Consumption Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms of the loan provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendants acknowledge their debt in this document.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account statement detailing the transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This envelope indicates attempted communication regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This envelope indicates further communication attempts related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of communication sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Martin.P.A., Antony. P.V., Thankamma regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Martin.P.A., Antony. P.V., Thankamma regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won