Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 70 of 2019

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hashim P.A et al regarding enforcement of an agreement

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-22
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months 22 days
Case Closed
Mon, 01/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff represented by its manager. The defendants are Hashim P.A and Abusa Beevi. The case revolves around the enforcement of an agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the I.A 5/2024 and decreed the suit in terms of the agreement. The terms were found lawful and enforceable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Terms of the agreement declared lawful and enforceable; decree in terms of the agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the I.A 5/2024 and decreed the suit in terms of the agreement. The terms were found lawful and enforceable.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the agreement were found lawful and enforceable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the agreement were found lawful and enforceable.
Supporting Evidence
Terms are found lawful and enforceable.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of the agreement and compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hashim P.A
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abusa Beevi
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja.R.Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.H Salam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the agreement and compromise shall form part of the decree.
Evidence:
I.A 5/2024 allowed. Terms are found lawful and enforceable. Hence suit is decreed in terms of the agreement and compromise shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hashim P.A et al regarding enforcement of an agreement
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hashim P.A et al regarding enforcement of an agreement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won