Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 549/2021

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Binu K. K., Viji K K. regarding suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a suit filed by M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank against Binu K. K. and Viji K K. A compromise petition was filed and both parties agreed to the terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The terms of compromise are to be included in the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise petition, IA 03/2025, is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years) Kadanthra Branch, Muttathil Lane, Kadavanthra, Kochi - 682 020

Defendants

Binu K. K. (43 years years) 'Kottarathil' House, Kundannoor, Maradu P.O., Pin - 682 304 Viji K K. (40 years years) 'Kottarathil' House, Valekkari Nikarthil, Kundannoor, Maradu P.O., Pin- 682304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise petition, IA 03/2025, is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise and the terms of compromise shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise.
Reference:
IA 03/2025

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases