Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 549/2021

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Binu K. K., Viji K K. regarding suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a suit filed by M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank against Binu K. K. and Viji K K. A compromise petition was filed and both parties agreed to the terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The terms of compromise are to be included in the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The terms of compromise are to be included in the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the term of compromise and found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise petition, IA 03/2025, is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager and Principal Officer, James C. P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu K. K.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viji K K.
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.K. Devarajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise petition, IA 03/2025, is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise and the terms of compromise shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise.
Reference:
IA 03/2025

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Binu K. K., Viji K K. regarding suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Binu K. K., Viji K K. regarding suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won