Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1466/2018

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anooja Dineesh et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-16
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 08/16/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank is seeking the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants, who are not complying with the repayment terms. The plaintiff bank claims that the defendants have defaulted on the loan repayments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. It was determined that the defendants failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of 6,31,289/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. It was determined that the defendants failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence showed that the defendants had acknowledged their liability and failed to repay the loan as per the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence showed that the defendants had acknowledged their liability and failed to repay the loan as per the agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The first defendant had knowledge of her liability on 15.10.2013. The suit was filed well within the period of limitation, and there was no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 6,31,289/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants or their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anooja Dineesh
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dinesh K.I
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad K.N
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Articles of Agreement, Acknowledgment of debt, Lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants ordered to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹6,31,289/- with interest
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 6,31,289/- (Rupees six lakhs thirty one thousand two hundred and eighty nine only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Articles of agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants for the purpose of the loan
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
First defendant acknowledged the liability
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanded payment from the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Order in WP(c) No. 169/2016
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided terms to the first defendant for liability discharge
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Letters
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Requests for consideration and time for payments from the first defendant
Reference:
Ext.A11, Ext.A12
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Final demand for payment before initiating suit
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed payment history and outstanding amount
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Gazette Notification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the bank's status
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application for term loan for higher education
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of loan application by first defendant
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anooja Dineesh et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anooja Dineesh et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/16/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won