O.S. No.1135/2022

Case between M/s. IDBI Bank vs Shri. Xavier V.A. et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-07-09

Duration

Case Closed

Tue, 07/09/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. IDBI Bank filed a suit against several defendants. The court dismissed the suit for lack of representation by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide proof for the case.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide proof for the case.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff no representation. Today the case has been posted for evidence of the plaintiff. Name called. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s. IDBI Bank
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shri. Xavier V.A.
Party Age: 73
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shri. Jerry Jose Kallikattu
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anwar Padiyathputhenkattil Abdul Kareem
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Mohandas N.S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sumson T.S.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.R. Rajith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default due to no representation and no proof affidavit filed.

Evidence: