Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1201/2024

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Tresa Joshua regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Tresa Joshua. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear or take any steps to issue summons to the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff systematically failed to appear or represent their case, leading to dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 31.01.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. (27 years) ICICI Bank Tower, Near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road, Vadodara Gujarat – 390 007

Defendants

Tresa Joshua (44 years) Arattukulam, Arakkunam, Edakkattunayal, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 313

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases