Case Summary
M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Tresa Joshua. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear or take any steps to issue summons to the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff systematically failed to appear or represent their case, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff systematically failed to appear or represent their case, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff systematically failed to appear or represent their case, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff systematically failed to appear or represent their case, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation and no steps taken to issue summons to defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 31.01.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented through its authorized person Mr. Vibin Sabu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tresa Joshua
- Party Age
- 44
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Tresa Joshua regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Tresa Joshua regarding dismissal of suit