Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1348 of 2017

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Kisamt Road Carriers et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-22
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. is seeking recovery of dues from Kisamt Road Carriers and its proprietor, Lincy Joseph. The suit arises from an overdraft facility extended to the defendants that became irregular due to non-repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the recovery of the outstanding amount against the defendants. The defendants are required to pay the outstanding dues along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs. 5,44,599 together with future interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments stand proved through unrebutted evidence presented by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs. 5,44,599 together with future interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Zonal Office, Pushpamangalam Estates, NH Bye Pass, Edappalli

Defendants

Kisamt Road Carriers (Age not specified years) Falcon Truck Terminal, Room No. 55/67, Puthiya road Junction, Udyogmandal P.O, Kochi 683 504 Lincy Joseph (43 years) Kathiraparambil House, South Kalamassery, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank to recover Rs. 5,44,599 along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs. 5,44,599 together with future interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Power of Attorney evidencing the plaintiff's authority.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Roaming Project Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the overdraft facility provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the notice sent to the defendants recalling the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the outstanding dues of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases