Case Summary
M/s ICICI Bank Limited filed a review petition against Prejith P Chandran. The court found that the matter had been settled between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is dismissed as not pressed due to the matter being settled between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff does not intend to proceed further.
Plaintiff does not intend to proceed further.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff does not intend to proceed further.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s ICICI Bank Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prejith P Chandran
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lal K Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Luxy T A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2018
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement