Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No.911/2023

Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs Chackochan.M.J. regarding court fee balance and representation

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Karnataka Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Chackochan.M.J. for recovery matters. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the court's decision to reject the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the requisite court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not present themselves in court and did not pay the required court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Karnataka Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Regd. and Head Office, Mahaveera Circle, P.B. No. 599, Kankanady, Mangalore, Pin – 575 002, branch at Palarivattom, Kerala

Defendants

Chackochan.M.J. (Age not specified years) House No. 31/707, Mukkath House, Kachapilly Road, Vytilla.P.O., Ernakulam, Pin – 682 019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC due to absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaintiff rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases