Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 114/2024

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Shiny Prasanth regarding settlement in mediation.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Canara Bank filed a suit against Shiny Prasanth. The case was concluded with terms settled in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled in mediation and the terms were deemed lawful. The court decided to close the case incorporating the terms in the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fee paid shall be refunded.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Terms of mediation found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Both represented. Settled in Mediation. Terms of Mediation found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of Mediation in Decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Sai Padmam Building, Deshabhimani Junction, Kaloor, Ernakulam - 682 017

Defendants

Shiny Prasanth (51 years years) Sithara, Chakkumkal Road, Palarivattom P.O, Pin- 682 025, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The settlement terms of mediation were incorporated in the decree and the case was closed.
Evidence:
Settled in Mediation. Terms of Mediation found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of Mediation in Decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Court fee paid shall be refunded.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases