Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 114/2024

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Shiny Prasanth regarding settlement in mediation.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Canara Bank filed a suit against Shiny Prasanth. The case was concluded with terms settled in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled in mediation and the terms were deemed lawful. The court decided to close the case incorporating the terms in the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fee paid shall be refunded.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled in mediation and the terms were deemed lawful. The court decided to close the case incorporating the terms in the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Terms of mediation found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Terms of mediation found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of Mediation found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Both represented. Settled in Mediation. Terms of Mediation found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of Mediation in Decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiny Prasanth
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. C Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mini G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Seena A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sali P. Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thankarajan P.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nikhil K. Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The settlement terms of mediation were incorporated in the decree and the case was closed.
Evidence:
Settled in Mediation. Terms of Mediation found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of Mediation in Decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Court fee paid shall be refunded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Shiny Prasanth regarding settlement in mediation.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Shiny Prasanth regarding settlement in mediation.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won