Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 890/2023

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Ajithakumari T et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-01
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Canara Bank, has filed a suit against the defendants, Ajithakumari T and A.R.Suryaputhri, for the recovery of money due from an educational loan. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite acknowledgment of debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total amount due from the educational loan along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs.3,17,424 with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total amount due from the educational loan along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided satisfactory evidence of the plaintiff's claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided satisfactory evidence of the plaintiff's claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.3,17,424 with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajithakumari T
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.R.Suryaputhri
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for Education Loan dated 12.09.18, Educational Loan Agreement dated 28.09.18, Acknowledgment of debt dated 09.06.21, Lawyer notice dated 02.08.23.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for the repayment of the loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.3,17,424/-(Rupees "Three Lakh and Seventeen Thousand and Four Hundred and Twenty Four only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the proceedings from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as part of the evidence to support the claim for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Educational Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents outlining the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An agreement related to the loan processed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial transaction details and status of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further correspondence regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An acknowledgment made by defendants confirming their debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendants demanding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the failed delivery of the notice to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the failed delivery of the notice to the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Ajithakumari T et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Ajithakumari T et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/28/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won