Case Summary
The case involves M/s Cananra Bank as the plaintiff against Unnimaya. U and Unnikrishna Pillai. The court has rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected U/O 7 R.11 (C) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Cananra Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnimaya. U
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishna Pillai
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I. Sowfiuar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. Hence plaint rejected U/O 7 R.11 (C) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs Unnimaya. U et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs Unnimaya. U et al regarding rejection of plaint