Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 OF 2018

Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Noufal regarding money transaction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a firm M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance suing Noufal for repayment of borrowed amount with interest. The defendant failed to pay and remained exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff is awarded ₹ 2,45,400 with interest for the money borrowed by the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Money Recovery Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff is awarded ₹ 2,45,400 with interest for the money borrowed by the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noufal
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
03-09-2018 Cheque for ₹ 2,40,000/-, 06-09-2018 Cheque Return Memo, 25-09-2018 Copy of Lawyer Notice, Unserved Letter, 30-03-2017 Promissory Note
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay ₹ 2,45,400/- with 18% interest per annum to plaintiff
Evidence:
The plaintiff adduced reliable evidence establishing the loan agreement and non-repayment by defendant
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realization of costs from the defendant
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant issued a cheque for ₹ 2,40,000/- which was returned as unpaid due to insufficient funds
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof that the cheque issued by the defendant was returned as unpaid due to insufficient funds
Reference:
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff issued a notice through counsel to the defendant demanding payment for the unpaid cheque
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory Note dated 30-03-2017 as evidence of the loan agreement
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Money Recovery Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Noufal regarding money transaction
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Noufal regarding money transaction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Finance Company

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Amina T et al regarding Money Recovery
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Money Recovery Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Varikkottil Hamza vs Shajid et al regarding money
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Money Recovery Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vasudevan Nair vs Usha and Another regarding Money Matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Money Recovery Suit Dismissed
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Complany Ltd. vs Leela regarding debt satisfaction
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition - Debt Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Achumma regarding money suit
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Money Recovery Suit Defendant Won