Case Summary
Plaintiff Varikkottil Hamza filed a suit against defendants seeking money which got dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the trial.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit with cost
Case Type
Money Recovery Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for money was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff was absent during the trial.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Name of plaintiff called. He is absent. The suit is included in the special list for trial. Hence the suit is dismissed with cost.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed with cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Varikkottil Hamza
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajid
- Party Age
- 33
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abida
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhali
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Seeking recovery of money.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with cost.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Unknown
Reference:
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Unknown
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Money Recovery Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Varikkottil Hamza vs Shajid et al regarding money
Case Code Year
Case between Varikkottil Hamza vs Shajid et al regarding money