Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.261/2021

Case between M/s Anugraha Auto Financiers vs Seena et al regarding settlement of monetary claim.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
Case Code No.
261
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Anugraha Auto Financiers filed a suit against Seena and Antu A. A. regarding a monetary claim. The case was settled through mediation discussions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case has been settled with the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff ₹1,20,000. The suit is decreed on the terms of the settlement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay ₹1,20,000 to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case has been settled with the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff ₹1,20,000. The suit is decreed on the terms of the settlement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff a specified amount as part of the settlement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff a specified amount as part of the settlement.
Supporting Evidence
The above-numbered case has been settled through mediation discussions held in the presence of the Mediator, on the following terms: Towards full and final settlement of the above case, the defendant has agreed to pay an amount of 1,20,000 (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand only) to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the settlement so arrived at, the suit is decreed on the above terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Anugraha Auto Financiers
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seena
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o A. A. Antu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antu A. A.
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o. Anthony
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bosco Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant agreed to pay an amount of 1,20,000 to the plaintiff as full and final settlement.
Evidence:
Towards full and final settlement of the above case, the defendant has agreed to pay an amount of 1,20,000 (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand only) to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won