Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 85/2023

Case between Mr. Sudheer Nair vs M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding rent control petition

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2024-06-10
Duration
approximately-2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Sudheer Nair filed a rent control petition against M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. and Mrs. A.K. Anila regarding non-compliance with a court order related to rent arrears. The court found that the respondents failed to comply and directed the landlord to be put in possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that all further proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped due to non-compliance by the respondents. The respondents were directed to put the landlord in possession of the scheduled building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The landlord is to be put in vacant possession of the scheduled building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for their non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the ACT stopping all further proceeding in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. Sudheer Nair (Age not specified years) Cheruvallivaru Puthen Veedu, Nalloor Vattom, Plamoottukada P.O. Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram-695128

Defendants

M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 44/2103, Desabhimani Junction, Kaloor P.O., Kochi-682017 Mrs. A.K. Anila (Age not specified years) 44/2103, Desabhimani Junction, Kaloor P.O., Kochi-682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Stopping all further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the ACT stopping all further proceeding in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases