Case Summary
Mr. Sudheer Nair filed a rent control petition against M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. and Mrs. A.K. Anila regarding non-compliance with a court order related to rent arrears. The court found that the respondents failed to comply and directed the landlord to be put in possession of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The landlord is to be put in vacant possession of the scheduled building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that all further proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped due to non-compliance by the respondents. The respondents were directed to put the landlord in possession of the scheduled building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for their non-compliance.
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for their non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
In the present case, more than two months have elapsed since the date of order. The respondent has not shown cause for not depositing the rent arrears.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the ACT stopping all further proceeding in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. Sudheer Nair
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. A.K. Anila
- Relation
- Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Suneethi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smitha Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sanjeev Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sindu B.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Stopping all further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the ACT stopping all further proceeding in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition scheduled building.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Sudheer Nair vs M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Sudheer Nair vs M/s. TECH U Tech Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding rent control petition