Case Summary
Petitioner Moidu filed a restoration petition against respondents seeking a specific order to be restored.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed restoration petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition as the cost was not paid.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost not paid. IA dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moidu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasudevan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreeja
- Party Age
- 35
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocates appearing for Vasudevan Nair-R1, 2, 3
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Restoration petition dismissed
Evidence:
Cost not paid. IA dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014