Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 287 OF 2016

Case between Moideenkutty vs Vadakkekkara Ayyappan's children regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-02-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moideenkutty, the plaintiff, is suing Vadakkekkara Ayyappan's children, the defendants, for the recovery of an advance payment made for a sale agreement concerning a property. The defendants failed to complete the transaction as per the agreement, prompting Moideenkutty to seek legal recourse.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Moideenkutty is entitled to recover Rs.3,00,000 with interest from the defendants due to their failure to honor the sale agreement. The court also ordered the defendants to cover the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and entire costs of the proceedings.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Moideenkutty is entitled to recover Rs.3,00,000 with interest from the defendants due to their failure to honor the sale agreement. The court also ordered the defendants to cover the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved the case, showing the defendants' failure to comply with the sale agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved the case, showing the defendants' failure to comply with the sale agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The defendants opted to remain exparte and they failed to contest their case. The available evidence showed that the plaintiff's case is proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed as follows: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization from the defendants and from their assets. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to realize the entire costs of the proceedings from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
37
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
35
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lakshmi
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Agreement dated 18-04-2016
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Najmudheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.C.P. Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed as follows: Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the entire costs of the proceedings from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the entire costs of the proceedings from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants for the sale of property.
Reference:
Ext A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moideenkutty vs Vadakkekkara Ayyappan's children regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Moideenkutty vs Vadakkekkara Ayyappan's children regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 04/18/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 02/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won