ORIGINAL SUIT No. 178 OF 2019

Case between Moideenkutty Palara et al vs Hamzakutty et al regarding Partition.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN

Order Date

2019-08-01

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Moideenkutty Palara, are seeking a partition. The defendants, including Hamzakutty, did not enter an appearance.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit for partition was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and reported lack of instructions.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide instructions for the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide instructions for the suit.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff's name called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Moideenkutty Palara
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed kutty
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima
Party Age: 56
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Asya
Party Age: 54
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hamzakutty
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunhipathumma
Party Age: 74
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunhami Umma
Party Age: 65
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kadeeja
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Hamza.K
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.P.Sreehari
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff's name was called absent.

Evidence: