Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 120/2021

Case between Mohanlal et al vs Sheena et al regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S., Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 days
Case Code No.
120
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Mohanlal and others, sought to restore their dismissed suit after they failed to appear in court. The respondents, Sheena and others, opposed the restoration.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The application to restore the suit was dismissed due to the lack of timely filing and absence of the plaintiffs during previous hearings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application to restore the suit was dismissed due to the lack of timely filing and absence of the plaintiffs during previous hearings.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The application was not filed in time and no reasonable explanation was provided for the plaintiffs' absence.
Supporting Evidence
The present application was not filed in time. No reason stated in the accompanying affidavit for the delay.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanlal
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Yamunabhai
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gangabhai
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu Bhai
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varun
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kiran Ravikumar
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Aji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.S.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Application to restore the suit on file
Evidence:
the application is only liable to be dismissed and I do so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won