Case Summary
Mohammedkutty, the petitioner filed a rent control petition against Aboobacker seeking relief under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of instructions from the petitioner's client.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for relief under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed with costs due to the absence of instructions from the petitioner's client.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Petition filed for under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Respondent is present. Hence petition is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammedkutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o Avulankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o Abu
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Rent Control Relief
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Relief under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Evidence:
Petition filed for under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Respondent is present. Hence petition is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammedkutty vs Aboobacker regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammedkutty vs Aboobacker regarding rent control