Case Summary
The petitioners filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondent from a building due to arrears in rent and for their bonafide need to conduct a hardware and paints business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction from the petition schedule building within two months
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established the bonafide need for the building for a hardware and paints business and the respondent did not challenge the evidence presented.
The petitioners established the bonafide need for the building for a hardware and paints business and the respondent did not challenge the evidence presented.
Judgment Evidence:
As already stated, the RCP.39/2015 and RCP.42/2015 are allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mohamed Rafi (44 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Rosina (30 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Fathima Bincy (28 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Iyyathkutty @Malummu (61 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Baiju (42 years)
Vettom amsom, Vemanna desom, Tirur Taluk
Sahida @ Safira (37 years)
Vettom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction from the petition schedule building within two months
Evidence:
As already stated, the RCP.39/2015 and RCP.42/2015 are allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reported damages to the building
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to building structure
Reference:
Ext.C2