Case Summary
Two separate petitions filed by petitioners seeking eviction of respondents from the petition schedule building due to bonafide need and damages caused by respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and realization of cost from respondent
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's bonafide need for the building was established while damages caused by respondents were not proven adequately.
The petitioner's bonafide need for the building was established while damages caused by respondents were not proven adequately.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the RCP.39/2015 and RCP.42/2015 are allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mohamed Rafi (44 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Rosina (30 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Fathima Bincy (28 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Iyyathkutty @Malummu (61 years)
Pachattiri amsom, Pariyappuram desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Baiju (42 years)
Vettom amsom, Vemanna desom, Tirur Taluk
Sahida @ Safira (37 years)
Vettom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondents and realization of cost
Evidence:
In the result, the RCP.39/2015 and RCP.42/2015 are allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Reported damage to building
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Layout plan of the building
Reference:
C2