Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 58/2020

Case between M.N Subha vs State Bank of India Ltd et al regarding abatement of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.N Subha is the plaintiff against multiple defendants including State Bank of India Ltd and others. The case concerns the abatement of the suit due to lack of steps taken to serve summons.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled the suit as abated due to lack of action to serve summons to the legal heirs of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled the suit as abated due to lack of action to serve summons to the legal heirs of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Lack of steps taken to serve summons.
Why Defendant Won:
Lack of steps taken to serve summons.
Supporting Evidence
Despite of innumerous chances and postings as last chance no further time, steps not taken to implead Legal Heirs of Plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Abated. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 22nd day of July, 2024).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.N Subha
Party Age
81
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Edappally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Goutham Raj
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syamala V.B
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kala Shahi, alias Kalaiselvi M.A
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal K Charles
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.N Hari Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lakshmy S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bijoy Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinod Antony K.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.A Vinod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.N Subha vs State Bank of India Ltd et al regarding abatement of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between M.N Subha vs State Bank of India Ltd et al regarding abatement of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won