Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs M.I.Mohammed and M.I.Aboobacker suing defendants MP’s Trading Cooperation and Abdul Kareem for recovery of rent dues. The defendants defaulted in paying the rent for a leased building used for trading electronic appliances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay Rs. 8,53,558/- with 6% interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendants to pay a total amount of Rs.8,53,558/- along with interest. In default, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendants' assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.8,53,558/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Fifty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Eight only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.I.Mohammed
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.I.Aboobacker
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- MP’s Trading Cooperation
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem K
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Notary attested copy of lease agreement, original lease agreement, original cheque leaves, original memos from bank regarding insufficient funds, legal notice.
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Unnikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nidhi Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ananda Padmanabhan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Uthara A.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vijay Krishnan S Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Goutham Krishnan U.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vivek Nair P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.R.Sudheendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.8,53,558/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.8,53,558/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Fifty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Eight only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notary attested copy of the lease agreement dated 01.10.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement between the plaintiff and defendant dated 14.06.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Cheque Leaf
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cheque leaf bearing No.001015 dated 30.08.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Cheque Leaf
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cheque leaf No.001016 dated 30.08.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Bank Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original memo from bank on account of insufficient funds bearing cheque No.001015 dated 18.10.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the legal notice dated 09.10.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt of legal notice dated 09.11.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Bank Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original memo from the bank on account of insufficient funds bearing cheque No.001016 dated 19.10.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between M.I.Mohammed et al vs MP’s Trading Cooperation et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M.I.Mohammed et al vs MP’s Trading Cooperation et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act