Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.281/2019

Case between Midhulesh et al vs P. V. Santhosh et al regarding Suit dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-11
Duration
Case Code No.
281
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Midhulesh and Kunjumuhammed brought a suit against P. V. Santhosh and S. Gopinathan. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default. Costs were awarded to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default. Costs were awarded to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default with cost to defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Midhulesh
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjumuhammed @ K. K. Muhammed
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. V. Santhosh
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Gopinathan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. O. santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. K. Jayapalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neepa Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raija C. Karim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendants.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default with cost to defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won