Case Summary
Mathai and Thankamma are the decree holders representing their interests. Peter and Joseph are the judgment debtors in an execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the delivery has been effected and the execution petition is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Delivery was effected as per the decree.
Delivery was effected as per the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Delivery was effected as per the decree.
Delivery was effected as per the decree.
Supporting Evidence
Delivery was effected as per the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. Report filed. Satisfaction recorded and Execution Petition closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathai
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamma
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Peter
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas Annamma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhash Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Johnson Pallikkunnel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathai et al vs Peter et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mathai et al vs Peter et al regarding execution petition