Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 109/2020

Case between Chandrika et al vs Venugopalan Nair et al regarding execution of decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-01-04
Duration
Case Code No.
109
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The decree holders, Chandrika and Sanooja, sought to execute a decree against the judgment debtors, including the deceased Venugopalan Nair and other defendants. The court adjudicated the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court recorded the satisfaction regarding the execution of the decree and closed the execution petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded the satisfaction regarding the execution of the decree and closed the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the delivery was effectively executed and satisfaction was recorded.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court determined that the delivery was effectively executed and satisfaction was recorded.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the delivery was completed and satisfaction was duly recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery effected. Satisfaction recorded and Execution Petition closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandrika
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanooja
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopalan Nair
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Swapna
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vipin
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hema Sreekumar
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.N.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R.A.Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.Sreejith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sujith Somasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vaikom Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Thomas Varghese et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Vaikom Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Anilkumar T.C et al regarding enforcement of decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Brahamamangalam Gramaswaraj Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Kuttappan regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sudharma Peethambaran et al regarding execution of a decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.V.Puram Farmers Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Shibu et al regarding Execution Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Execution Petition Defendant Won