Case Summary
Mary is the judgment debtor who filed a petition regarding the fair value of a decree. The court dismissed the petition stating there was no error apparent in the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Mary was dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Housing Co-operative Society
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Varghese (Late)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jomon
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jomol @ Jeemol
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M G Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C. J. Soloman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ambily E. G.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition was dismissed as there was no error apparent in the case.
Evidence:
Now Judgment Debtor came stating that the fair value is not correct etc. There is no error apparent. Hence, petition dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.A.NO.
Case Code Year
2025