Case Summary
Mary Mathew filed a petition for restoration in the Munsiff Court. The petition was allowed after considering the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration filed by Mary Mathew.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed due to the reasons stated in the affidavit.
The petition was allowed due to the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed due to the reasons stated in the affidavit.
The petition was allowed due to the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit, this petition is allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
this petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary Mathew
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vrinda Rajesh
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sigtech Marketing Private Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2025