Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1051/2020

Case between Mariyam Beevi vs Vino Bastin regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-03
Duration
approximately-4 years
Case Closed
Wed, 04/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mariyam Beevi, is seeking to recover unpaid rent from the defendant, Vino Bastin. The defendant has not occupied the rented premises since March 2019 and has defaulted in rental payments, leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total of Rs.2,39,354 along with applicable interest for the overdue rent. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.2,39,354 with interest as specified.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total of Rs.2,39,354 along with applicable interest for the overdue rent. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a clear case of non-payment of rents due under the lease agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a clear case of non-payment of rents due under the lease agreement.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,39,354 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.2,39,354 (Rupees Two lakhs thirty nine thousand three hundred and fifty four only) with interest @ 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.1,93,512 (Rupees One lakh ninety three thousand five hundred and twelve only) from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyam Beevi
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vino Bastin
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the order passed in RCP No. 175 of 2019, Certified copy of the order passed in RCP No. 176 of 2019, Statement of rental arrears due to the plaintiff from March 2019 to October 2020.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandhya.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ralitzine Mendez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Exparte

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,39,354/- with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,39,354/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of the Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that defendant is evicted from the plaint schedule rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of the Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that defendant is evicted from the plaint schedule rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of rental arrears
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the amount of rent arrears due to the plaintiff from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True copy of RCP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed by the plaintiff before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of RCP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed by the plaintiff before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that delivery of property is effected.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that delivery of property is effected.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mariyam Beevi vs Vino Bastin regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Mariyam Beevi vs Vino Bastin regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 04/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M.K.Crown vs Thrikkakara Muncipality et al regarding declaration and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Partial
Case between Arun R Nair vs Panjos Garden Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Annie Martin et al vs Suresh C.V et al regarding damages and arrears of rent
Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunitha Kumari vs Clearway Astrum Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding Petition for temporary injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won