Case Summary
Maraud Municipality is seeking to enforce a decree for payment of compensation against Tresiyamma Joseph. The court found that the claim made by the Municipality was not in accordance with the original decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The claim for realization of money was not in accordance with the decree.
The claim for realization of money was not in accordance with the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
This petition has come up for hearing before me on 03.06.2025 and the court on the same day, passed the following:- ORDER Heard both sides. Perused records. Decree is for payment of compensation at the rate of Rs. 1864/- per month with future interest @ 6 % per annum from two months next after the expiration of the date of decree till vacant possession is handed over. Vacant possession was reported to be handed over on November, 2024. Hence amount due is the amount from 29th April 2020 to November, 2024, with interest as ordered. But the claim in the E.P is not as per the decree...
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Maraud Municipality (Age not specified years)
Maradu village, Maradu
Defendants
Tresiyamma Joseph (not known years)
Treesa Textiles, EMS Memorial Municipal Library Building, Maradu P.O, Ernakulam
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Prayer in the E.P for realisation of money.
Evidence:
the prayer in the E.P, for realisation of money, and the balance statement filed is not in accordance with the decree.