Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.113/2021

Case between Manoj A.N vs Shabu regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manoj A.N is the plaintiff and Shabu is the defendant in a case concerning the partition of property. The court passed a final decree allowing the plaintiff a 7/8 share of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued a final decree granting the plaintiff 7/8 share of the property and the defendant 1/8 share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition of property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued a final decree granting the plaintiff 7/8 share of the property and the defendant 1/8 share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner is entitled to 7/8 share as per the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner is entitled to 7/8 share as per the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
I have perused the preliminary decree, commission report and plan. I am satisfied that Ext. C1 (a) plan is prepared in accordance with the preliminary decree and a final decree can be passed in terms of Ext. C1(a) plan.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, final decree is passed as follows:- a. The plot denoted with letters ABGDEFA in Ext. C1 (a) plan is allotted to the petitioner/plaintiff as his 7/8 share of plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manoj A.N
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabu
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Shyla K.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree declaring the share of property allotted to each party.
Evidence:
In the result, final decree is passed as follows:- a. The plot denoted with letters ABGDEFA in Ext. C1 (a) plan is allotted to the petitioner/plaintiff as his 7/8 share of plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commission report was used to effect partition as per the preliminary decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The survey plan was verified and found to be in accordance with the preliminary decree for passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1 (a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manoj A.N vs Shabu regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Manoj A.N vs Shabu regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Tue, 07/27/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won