Case Summary
The plaintiff, Manoj, seeks a perpetual injunction against the defendants who are threatening to annex part of the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of the disputed property and has provided evidence to support his case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff went unchallenged, and the plaintiff proved his case for a perpetual injunction.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff went unchallenged, and the plaintiff proved his case for a perpetual injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The defendants or anybody under them are restrained from entering forcefully into the plaint schedule property, or destroy the compound wall or foundation or gate situating on the eastern side of the plaint schedule property, or annex any portion of plaint schedule property to the property of the defendants, by way of perpetual injunction.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Manoj (44 years)
Thekkanathu House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Defendants
Ambika Unnithan (60 years)
Kottarathil House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Paulose (60 years)
Anjilimoottil House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Beena Paulose (60 years)
Anjilimoottil House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Aiswaraya Paul (30 years)
Anjilimoottil House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Vivek Paul (28 years)
Anjilimoottil House, Pazhanganad Thamarachalpuram Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested to restrain the defendants from entering or damaging the property.
Evidence:
The defendants or anybody under them are restrained from entering forcefully into the plaint schedule property, or destroy the compound wall or foundation or gate situating on the eastern side of the plaint schedule property, or annex any portion of plaint schedule property to the property of the defendants, by way of perpetual injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed proving the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report submitted to the court relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch submitted alongside the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report submitted detailing the survey of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Survey plan submitted alongside the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)